Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan, also known as Bacha Khan (1890 - 1988)
| Bacha Khan |
Bacha Khan, father of Ghani Khan and Wali Khan, was born in 1890 in the Utmanzai (Charsadda) in Peshawar. The fourth child, he was sent to a local mosque for religious education. After the completion of his Qur'an lessons, he was sent to the Municipal Board High School in Peshawar, where he later joined the Edwardes Memorial Mission High School. When his elder brother was sent to Bombay for medical school, Bacha Khan remained with his family servant, who later influenced Bacha Khan's decision to join the British Indian army. However, as he was in the process of applying, he witnessed a British Raj officer mistreating a countryman and also realized that the Guide officers, an elite corp of Pashtun soldiers for the British Raj, were treated like second-class citizens; this highly offended him and made him change his mind about joining the army.
Although Bacha Khan's father wanted to send him to England to study medicine, his mother disapproved, and Bacha Khan stayed back. However, he took advantage of the opportunity of staying back with his people to be of service to them. Always keeping the interests of his people, the Pashtuns, in mind, Bacha Khan decided to become a social activist; convinced that the Pashtuns needed education, organization, and reformation, he and another social reformer, Haji Fazli Wahid (Haji of Turangzai) who also stood against the British rule, established some religious educational institutes in Utmanzai and Mardan in 1910--when Bacha Khan was barely 20 years old. There, the students were not just given religious education, but they were also taught to be good patriots. Because the Haji urged his students and Pashtuns to unite against the British rule, the British attempted to imprison him but he escaped in time. With his escape, however, the British closed down the institutions he and Bacha Khan had established and imprisoned its teachers.
Bacha Khan was imprisoned after he held successful anti-British Imperialism assembly of Pashtuns in Utmanzai, attended by over 50,000 Pashtun. Holding such an assembly was a crime because of the British Indian Rowlatt Act, which banned people from committing to or initiating any "revolutionary" (anti-British) activities. Bacha Khan was arrested, and the villagers of Utmanzai were fined 30,000 rupees; over a hundred and fifty notables were kept in confinement until the fine was paid. Bacha Khan was released six months later.
Bacha Khan traveled through 500 villages between 1915-1918 in Khyber Pashtunkhwa (then called the Northwestern Frontier Province) in an effort to organize, unite, and educate the Pashtuns. It is these kinds of efforts and activities that earned him the title of "Bacha Khan," which means King of Chiefs.
His social activism led to the founding of the Khudai Khidmatgar (literally, the Servants of God) Movement. The movement was based on non-violence opposition to the British Raj, and Bacha Khan told its members:
I am going to give you such a weapon that the police and the army will not be able to stand against it. It is the weapon of the Prophet, but you are not aware of it. That weapon is patience and righteousness. No power on earth can stand against it. [source]
| Bacha Khan and Gandhi |
The movement proved successful and won him a large number of followers among Pashtuns--with over 100,000 members alone. Unfortunately, Bacha Khan was sent into exile because the movement was a threat to British imperialism. It was then, in the 1920s, that he formed an alliance with Gandhi and the Indian National Congress, an alliance that lasted until 1947--the partition of India. This was because he and his supporters felt betrayed by both India and Pakistan after the partition, and his last words to Gandhi were, "You have thrown us to the wolves," because the Pashtuns of British India were not offered the choice of being an independent state or re-joining with Afghanistan after the formation of the Durand Line, the boundary between modern-day Afghanistan and Pakistan; instead, they were compelled to choose between joining Pakistan or India, and voting results showed that the majority wanted to join Pakistan--the Muslim state, considering Pashtuns are also Muslims.
Because Bacha Khan strongly opposed the partition, he was constantly thrown in prison by the Pakistani government after independence (August 14, 1947) because of his association with India and his opposition to the Pakistani authorities. As a result, he spent much of the 1960s and 1970s either in jail or in exile.Bacha Khan pledged allegiance to Pakistan in 1948 in an attempt to establish healthy relations with Pakistan and Muhammad Ali Jinnah. However, Jinnah was told that Bacha Khan was plotting his assassination or was otherwise a threat to the Pakistani government, which led to the non-violent soldier's house arrest. After his release, he was arrested again, many times between 1948 and 1964. Due to the amount of time he spent in prison (over half of his lifetime), he was granted the Amnesty International Prisoner of the Year award. In 1984, he was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. In 1967, he was awarded the Jawaharlal Nehru Award for International Understanding, while in 1987, he won India's highest civilian award, the Bharat Ratna--becoming the first non-Indian to receive the award.
Bacha Khan died under house arrest in Peshawar in 1988 and was buried in Jalalabad, Afghanistan. He had requested that he be buried in Jalalabad because it symbolized the unification of the Pashtuns; thus, his dream of Pashtun unity continues to live on. India's Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi went to Peshawar to honor Bacha Khan, despite Pakistan's (Zia ul-Haq's) efforts to prevent the visit, citing security reasons. The government of India also honored Bacha Khan by declaring a five-day period of mourning upon his death. Although there was a Civil War in Afghanistan during Bacha Khan's death, a ceasefire was declared so that his funeral could take place (albeit not in peace: a bomb explosion killed 15 people at the funeral), as thousands upon thousands paid their respect, marching for the man of peace, the non-violent Pashtun soldier of God who spent over half of his lifetime in prison because of fighting to bring his people, the Pashtuns, together as one nation, under no one else's power, controlled by no one else.
Rest in peace, Bacha Khan. You have left us a lot to ponder over and learn from. May you be rewarded for all your efforts and struggles--and may your decades of unjust imprisonment (at the hands of British India and later Pakistan) be rewarded with eternal peace. Aameen.
It's a shame that he is not nearly as recognized as Gandhi is, despite the similarities in their beliefs, struggles, and influences. What's worse, few Pakistanis recognize him while much of India revers this man. On a personal note, I can't stand it when people refer to him as "the frontier Gandhi." No, he was not the Frontier Gandhi! He wasn't a Gandhi at all. He was an individual, his own person; can he not be recognized without any references or links to Gandhi or any other person? It's a pity that even many Pashtuns still don't know about him--but they all, the ones in/from Pakistan--know Jinnah very well.
Books about him and/or in his honor include:
- My life and struggle : autobiography of Badshah Khan
- A Man to Match His Mountains: Badshah Khan, Nonviolent Soldier of Islam
- India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan : a study of freedom struggle and Abdul Ghaffar Khan
- Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan: The apostle of nonviolence (Champions of nonviolence)
- IDEAS OF A NATION: KHAN ABDUL GHAFFAR KHAN
- Islam's Peaceful Warrior: Abdul Ghaffar Khan
- Khudai khidmatgar and national movement: Momentous speeches of Badshah Khan
- The Frontier Gandhi: His Place in History
The main sources for the above include:
Abdul Ghaffar Khan
Details of Bacha Khan
Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan

i can't agree more than that on the issue of frontier Gandhi .my memory is hazy but i think i have read (syed waqar ali shah islam ethnicity and nationalism)that the non violence of bacha khan stems from the non violence of the holy Prophet (the meccan period before the hijra )another thing which surprises me is that most of our (hyper)liberal friends altogether forget (leave)about the religious sentiments of bacha khan(ofcourse not u your essay was short) like he performed haj etc.by the way i have the greatest respect for mahatima Gandhi .yes we should not forget bacha khan and his dream of peace and education . good job .keep it up.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment, Naif! :) Much appreciated!
DeleteI agree! I've noted the same things about most Pashtun nationalists (and I know them only online) who want the independence of Pashtuns and/or the complete unity of the Pashtuns of Pakistan and Afghanistan under one Pashtun nation.
Yes, it's true that Bacha Khan's understanding of non-violence actually stemmed from Islam. He was a staunch follower of (peaceful) Islam, he stood against extremist/violent Islam, and he strongly supported progression and reform. He knew that Pashtuns lacked a decent understanding of Islam and were also lacking in education in general, and that was his motive behind establishing the schools that he ran.
This man was a real hero. He was a real man, a real human, a real Pashtun. May he rest in peace, aameen.
Did he want to be a part of combine India?
ReplyDeleteWhy he was so much honored by India?
Please educate me?
Thanks for your questions, Balarkhela!
DeleteAs the above write-up notes, Bacha Khan did not support the partition. He did not want Pashtuns to be a part of Pakistan; he wanted full independence for them--or the complete unity of all Pashtuns, the Pashtuns of British India (modern-day Pakistan) and the Pashtuns of Afghanistan.
He is and was honored by India because they were united by their resistance to British India. Indians loved and love Gandhi, and Bacha Khan and Gandhi were allies and shared the same views on non-violent resistance towards the British. Where the Indians would rise in protest to the British, the Pashtuns, under Bacha Khan's guidance, would rise in protest of the same colonialists. Basically, their efforts tremendously helped lead to the riddance of British imperialism in South Asia, although Bacha Khan was disappointed (and felt betrayed) by India when they didn't support Pashtuns' independence, as mentioned above.
So, yeah :) I hope that clarifies it a bit!
I agree with most of your points but at the moment we are part of Pakistan and we should play our role inside Pakistan. I know Pakhtuns are divided by other forces but as Bacha Khan or Wali Khan has a very popular quotation that " Pukhtano pa yawa khabara ethefaaq karay de che ethefaaq ba na kaoo." We should not blame others but to revisit our own deeds and our own leaders. I respect Bacha Khan but I am really disappointed by his grandson's politics. Bacha Khan was a sign of bravery but for Asfandyar one suicide attack was enough to keep him away from his people.
DeleteI am proud to be Pakhtun and I am also proud to be a Pakistani, because I think instead of wasting energy to oppose Pakistan we should do some constructive work for Pakhtuns while remaining part of Pakistan. Only making complains will not solve the problem. Our main focus should be education among Pakhtuns without which development is not possible.
Sorry for some random thoughts lacking coherence :-)
I am waiting for your comments....
DeleteBalarkel, you have valid points and these are the same concerns I raise with Orbala all the time....Be a Proud Pakhtun Pakistani...but she seems bent on making the Indians happy...I hope she had done more research on Bacha Khan (I love and respect Bacha Khan and love the fact that he gave up being a feudal lord to help his people), but did you know that his main concern with Pakistan was the fact that the Pakhtun areas were setup as 1 unit and Bacha Khan wanted the Pakhtun area as units, Yahya Khan setup the Pakhtun area as FATA and Bacha Khan was pleased (though he would have wanted a totally autonomous state) by it.
DeleteWhy people loved Bacha Khan is because he wanted people to be educated and fight with the power of the pen instead of the sword. The main enemies, the British (which Orabala does not talk much about) did not like this, and jailed Bacha Khan many times. He prevailed due to his non violent movement.
anyways, I think Bacha Khan would have had a good role in Pakistan politics if he was given the chance...read this
http://dawn.com/2012/08/14/the-two-muslim-theory/
and mind you, as generally perceived, and the author of this blog had also tweeted that people in Pakistan and Pakhtuns don not remember Bacha Khan....fyi, we remember him very much and we do know and respect him more than you think we do!!!
qrratugai... Warka os jawaab :-)
DeleteThank you for the reminder to reply to him, Balarkhela! To your comment, I don't remember implying that we as Pakistani Pashtuns don't have a significant role to play in Pakistan--or otherwise that Pashtuns shouldn't be proud of being Pakistanis, etc. As I have always stressed in every Pashtun-related discussion on this blog and everywhere else, there are more than one types of identity, such as ethnic and national. We are ethnically Pashtun and nationally Pakistani. Our Pashtun brothers and sisters over in Afghanistan are also ethnically Pashtun but they are nationally Afghan.
DeleteHowever, I also want to emphasize re-visiting our history, understanding Bacha Khan's role in our fate, his sincere efforts to liberate us from the chains of any oppressive regimes, and his disappointment when he did not succeed (i.e., when formerly British-Indian Pashtuns fell to Pakistan). It surely sucks that we can't go back in history, but there's merit in reminding ourselves of that, along with remembering where over half of his life was spent *and why*; surely, it helps explain to a large extent our current situation today.
@ "Anonymous," thank you very much for your insight. I don't remember, however, saying that no one in Pakistan remembers him. Read above for further info.
Thanks, you both, for your comments!
A very interesting read.
ReplyDeleteVery much endorse the sentiments of not referring him as ' Frontier Gandhi'. But given that age and sentiments should not be taken harshly. Nevertheless,time to restore the man's rightful stature in history.
An interesting read.
ReplyDeleteI fully endorse the sentiments of not referring to him as 'Frontier Gandhi', but given that age and sentiments !! anybody's take.
Time to restore his rightful stature in history which sadly enough been denied.
Does he not present an excellent rallying point for both the Nation's to move towards peace.
About 80-100 years ago, pretty much the same set of people who form the Taliban today were secular and non-violent. It was an incredible achievement and the entire credit should go to Badshah Khan.
ReplyDeleteI don't see why he shouldn't be called "the Frontier Gandhi". Of course he was a person in his own right, but an association with Gandhi is very high honour in the eyes of the world. Gandhi grew up in a Hindu-Jain tradition with an large emphasis on non-violence, but the Pashtun people have no such background. Hence Badshah Khan's adoption of non-violence was considered a bigger achievement in India than Gandhi's. There is no other freedom fighter in India who is called the-anything-gandhi, which shows the esteem in which Badshah Khan was held.
Mention should also be made of George Cunningham, the last British governor
of the NWFP, who in an attempt to reduce Badshah Khan's influence over his people, encouraged a bunch of Mullahs to spread opposition to him on the grounds that he wasn't Islamic enough and tended towards secularism.
we all the pukhtoons are proud of our great leader Abdul Ghaffar khan (Fakhr-e-Afghan... we are non-violant and are GOD Servants
ReplyDeletesee whats is the situation of pashtoon in these days specially of our tribe area,this is all what bacha khan not want,pashtoon though fight in themselves but they always unite against others,now they cant be unite even the invaders killing us.
ReplyDelete