Yesterday, I went to a conference on the Qur'an, and it may have been the
best conference I've ever attended so far.
Imagine an entire two days dedication to questions on, reflections on, appreciation for the Qur'an. It's just not the kind of thing you come across just any day. So it's something special, something that inspires you in every way, something that challenges you in many ways, something that, at the very least, humbles you and reminds you of how much more there is to know out there about anything and everything but especially about a Sacred Book that defines your life for you.
The best part about it was its
inclusion of non-academic community members and imams, in addition to
the academics, which was a necessary reminder to me of the importance of
keeping our focus and point in mind when dealing with the Qur'an. Sometimes, we
(I) forget that the Qur'an is actually a living and alive Text that
holds deep purpose in the lives of most, if not virtually all, Muslims
around the world in very personal, spiritual ways. And so, our academic readings of it are just as narrow as theological/legal/practical readings alone of it are; so, in order to
understand it in a more holistic way, it is best to read (interpret) it
with as open a mind as humanly possible and with as wide a circle of
readers (interpreters) as possible--such that, for example, you
interpret a certain guideline from a certain viewpoint, and then try to
understand what the implications of that interpretation are for those
involved so as to be able to determine whether or not there might be a
better interpretation. Plus, you get to ask a question or pose a certain
view and get responses and feedback from multiple perspectives in a way
that humbles you and makes you realize how small you actually are when
imprisoned in your own mind alone.
This last point was reminded to us by a speaker not in her presentation but just in a comment at the end--that our experiences are essential in shaping our understanding of the Qur'an. One of my favorite scholars of Islam, named Sa'diyya Shaikh, discusses this so darn well in her article "A Tafsir of Praxis" (for anyone who might not know, since I myself first saw this word hardy a few years ago, praxis basically means practice and is usually seen as the alternative to theory). So, Shaikh basically points out the importance of using women's--or anyone's--actual experiences as a mode of interpretation/exegesis of the Qur'an/Islam. Think of it this way: the guidelines of Islamic law (which were established by groups of men over a few hundred years and never actually took into consideration the views or experiences or understanding of women especially when giving guidelines about women in the first place) issues all these guidelines about how to live, behave, etc., right? Let's admit that certain groups are more affected by law, no matter how divine it may be claimed to be, than other groups. For example, women suffer more from certain unfair interpretations of some Qur'anic verses, such as 4:34 (the "beating" verse, as it has been called, despite the fact that there are multiple ways, some non-violent, of interpreting that verse), and it's actually because of that interpretation that they suffer, right? So, since women themselves are the ones living that interpretation, and they're affected negatively in many cases, why not allow their experiences to teach us that: "No! This can't be! *I* am affected by *your* understanding of something! Why not let *me* and others like me determine what this should or might actually mean?" It's one thing to simply offer an interpretation or a guideline, but it's completely different when that guideline is lived and experiences. And those experiences matter, whether we like it or not.
Hm... I'm going off track here, but that was one of the most important reminders I got, so not totally off track, yeah?
Another thing. Someone spoke about the word ta'weel (which basically means interpretation but literally "going back to the original meaning of" something ... coming from the word awwal or first) and the whole concept of interpretation. Does the Qur'an "need" to be interpreted, and if so, what exactly does that mean and what might that say about God and God's all-Powerfullness? And who should do the interpretation? Of course, this isn't a new question, and Muslim scholars debated this issue for centuries. But the speaker offered some new ways of looking at the concept of interpretation, and I don't know if I should discuss them here since her paper is not published yet. I'll cite it here as soon as it's published, though, inshaAllah. This particular presentation was impressive. Very inspiring.
Someone else talked about women's political authority and the Qur'anic figure Bilqees (well, she's not named in the Qur'an, but the Islamic tradition calls her Bilqees, and she's the Queen of Sheba and wife of Solomon). She was a powerful figure, she was a queen, she ran an entire kingdom, and the Qur'an doesn't in any way imply that her authority was unacceptable, that she was intellectually lacking, or that she did any bad or wrong at all. In fact, from what the Qur'an tells us, she did everything right! The Book speaks of her in pleasant terms. But there's a hadith [to non-Muslims: hadith = a statement by or about the Prophet Muhammad], which unfortunately is far too popular in many Muslim societies, that any nation or community led by a woman is doomed to failure, a hadith narrated by someone named Abu Bakra. The speaker discussed what Ashraf Ali Thanvi, a South Asian Muslim scholar who died in 1943, had to say about women's political authority. Well, Thanvi basically said that the hadith doesn't refer to women's political authority as we understand it today--that, yes, indeed women are intellectual inferior to men and must not be trusted with important decision-making and must always have men making the decisions for them, BUT today's governments function in such a way that no one person makes a decision. So even if a woman is in power, she doesn't make the ultimate decision. Yeah, Thanvi is the same guy who wrote that marriage advice for women that I talked about on my blog recently that is really disturbing because he, well, simply put, he hates women and thinks very lowly of them.
There were so many other remarkable presentations.
All in all, it was a spiritually and intellectually empowering experience, and I am excited to attend all of its future ones as well, inshaAllah.
Thaaaaaaank you for listening.
Hm... I'm going off track here, but that was one of the most important reminders I got, so not totally off track, yeah?
Another thing. Someone spoke about the word ta'weel (which basically means interpretation but literally "going back to the original meaning of" something ... coming from the word awwal or first) and the whole concept of interpretation. Does the Qur'an "need" to be interpreted, and if so, what exactly does that mean and what might that say about God and God's all-Powerfullness? And who should do the interpretation? Of course, this isn't a new question, and Muslim scholars debated this issue for centuries. But the speaker offered some new ways of looking at the concept of interpretation, and I don't know if I should discuss them here since her paper is not published yet. I'll cite it here as soon as it's published, though, inshaAllah. This particular presentation was impressive. Very inspiring.
Someone else talked about women's political authority and the Qur'anic figure Bilqees (well, she's not named in the Qur'an, but the Islamic tradition calls her Bilqees, and she's the Queen of Sheba and wife of Solomon). She was a powerful figure, she was a queen, she ran an entire kingdom, and the Qur'an doesn't in any way imply that her authority was unacceptable, that she was intellectually lacking, or that she did any bad or wrong at all. In fact, from what the Qur'an tells us, she did everything right! The Book speaks of her in pleasant terms. But there's a hadith [to non-Muslims: hadith = a statement by or about the Prophet Muhammad], which unfortunately is far too popular in many Muslim societies, that any nation or community led by a woman is doomed to failure, a hadith narrated by someone named Abu Bakra. The speaker discussed what Ashraf Ali Thanvi, a South Asian Muslim scholar who died in 1943, had to say about women's political authority. Well, Thanvi basically said that the hadith doesn't refer to women's political authority as we understand it today--that, yes, indeed women are intellectual inferior to men and must not be trusted with important decision-making and must always have men making the decisions for them, BUT today's governments function in such a way that no one person makes a decision. So even if a woman is in power, she doesn't make the ultimate decision. Yeah, Thanvi is the same guy who wrote that marriage advice for women that I talked about on my blog recently that is really disturbing because he, well, simply put, he hates women and thinks very lowly of them.
There were so many other remarkable presentations.
All in all, it was a spiritually and intellectually empowering experience, and I am excited to attend all of its future ones as well, inshaAllah.
Thaaaaaaank you for listening.
